Categories
Nature

The Authentic Self

Ron had to run some errands. There was the post office to send a parcel, then the bank to deposit donations he’d collected for a charity, then the convenience store for groceries. However, it took him longer to move from one location to the next, and when he checked his watch, he realized that at his current pace the entire morning would be gone by the time he had finished at the convenience store.

He couldn’t explain why he was moving so slowly. It felt as if there was more resistance from the sidewalk. Maybe the city had sprayed a special coat on the sidewalk to make it less slippery. With winter coming, a non-slip surface would be useful.

At the corner, where a huge billboard overlooks the parking lot, two workers were putting up a new ad. Ron paused to watch them unfurl rolled up sheets of paper then smooth them into place with glorified squeegees. The ads featured young people, physically exceptional, like everyone in the world of advertising. They smiled with gleaming perfect teeth and wore brightly coloured clothes. Each held a smart phone, some, texting, others, talking. The workers hadn’t unfurled all the words yet. Something about living your most authentic life. Sharing your true self with your true friends. Sentimental goop. Ron didn’t wait for them to finish, but moved on.

As Ron was arriving at the post office, his cousin Andrew approached from the opposite direction and seeing Ron, his stony face came alive. He shouted Ron’s name and asked how he was doing. It was an animated exchange until Andrew glanced over Ron’s shoulder to the sidewalk behind him and his lively face turned to stone again. He excused himself. Said it was great to see Ron. Would love to shoot the shit but he was late for a dental appointment.

On his way to the bank, something similar happened. He saw an old friend named Marty who was drinking coffee while sitting on the edge of a concrete planter, so he stopped to say hi. At first, Marty seemed happy to see him. All smiles and sunshine. But after looking past Ron, on down the sidewalk behind him, Marty’s expression clouded. Unlike Andrew, who tended to be contained, Marty was more inclined to let everything out.

Geez, Ronny boy, you having bladder control issues?

Christ, Marty, what a thing to ask.

Despite the insult, Ron checked the crotch area of his trousers to be sure he didn’t have any leakage and found that all was dry. He pointed emphatically at his crotch and told Marty to check it out. In turn, Marty pointed to the sidewalk behind Ron and told him to check it out. Ron turned and saw a wide line of moisture trailing from the place where he stood and extending all the way back to the intersection. The moisture gleamed in the morning light.

Christ, Marty, what’s happening to me?

Not your bladder?

No.

Ron knelt beside the trail of moisture and dabbed it with an index finger. The fluid was clear and felt viscous, like the gooey trailings of a slug. It was clear to Ron that this was coming from him, this leakage, but he had no way to account for it. He raised his gaze from the sidewalk to the workers in the distance who were putting away their tools and climbing down from the billboard. Why was it, he wondered, that in the world of advertising, the authentic self was so neat and so pleasing to look at while here on the ground it was such a messy proposition?

Categories
Nature

Photo Accessibility

A black and white photograph of reeds extending from the water while their warped reflections appear on the surface of the water.
Mckay’s Harbour, Lion’s Head Provincial Park

Several years ago, in another context, I lamented the rise of what I described as photographic literalism. It’s a problem produced by search engines which rely on tagging to index photographs. In order to for photographs to rank well in Google searches, the associated tags have to accurately describe what appears in the photograph. We see the same thing on photo sites like Instagram and Flickr where often the photos that get the most attention are those with the best configuration of hashtags.

People have become fixated on the thingness of an image. This is a picture of X. This thing called X is a Platonic X that has about it an ideal quality of Xness. We can name it and classify it and slot it into its proper cubbyhole. Taxonomy is king! Long live the well-named!

While hashtags have their place, it’s important to recognize their shortcomings, too. Hashtags have no way to note ambivalence or vagueness, meanings that teeter on a fulcrum, feelings, the numinous experience, intimations of a spiritual life, visual poetry. And they have no way to register fleeting sensations: I looked here and suddenly I was taken back to my childhood. Instead, hashtags presume that a thing is a thing is a thing for all time.

Accessibility has given new life to the issue of photographic literalism. I’m quite happy to describe my photographs in alt tags for the benefit of those who are visually impaired. It’s a helpful measure for people who chance upon my web pages and want to understand how I have integrated visual media with my words. But, as with hashtags, it’s important to acknowledge the limitations of these tools.

A photograph is more than a representation of a thing. It may also be a provocation or an evocation. If it’s any good at all, it makes the viewer feel something. It is not so much the thing as it is the feeling that is the point of a photograph.

I think, in addition to the alt tag, there should be a poetry tag: a short ekphrastic statement about the feelings a photograph evokes. In the image above, for example, the alt tag reads: “A black and white photograph of reeds extending from the water while their warped reflections appear on the surface of the water.” Yes, but I might also write: “I was filled with a sense of calm as a gentle breeze rippled the shallow waters and, for a brief moment, I felt a sense of surrender.” Nothing overly flowery, something simple to suggest a state of mind.

Categories
Nature

Nomenclature

At the beginning of a semester in high school chemistry, the teacher rhymed off all the general topics we’d be covering. That was the last science course I ever took, and I don’t remember any of the topics our teacher mentioned … except one. She said we’d be learning about nomenclature. One of my classmates put up her hand and asked, in all seriousness: “Who’s Norman Clature?” She thought maybe he was a famous chemist.

In certain circles, people think Norman Clature is a big deal. In other circles, not so much. In photography, people’s views divide down the middle. A lot hangs on what a given photographer thinks their photograph is for. If, for example, a photograph of a bug is going to end up in a textbook on entomology, then Norman Clature will likely insist on correctly identifying the bug. On the other hand, if a photograph of a bug is going to end up in an artsy forum where viewers are more concerned about line and colour and composition, then Norman Clature may not be so fussy.

For me, the challenge is that sometimes I have no idea (nor control over) how a given photograph will be used. Take today’s image, for example. Focus takes our eyes to a spiky seed pod covered in a thin layer of melting ice. I have no idea what species of seed pod this is. Maybe a chestnut? When I set up my tripod and framed this shot, I wasn’t thinking: “Oh, there’s a fine example of [insert Latin phrase here].” I was thinking: “Isn’t it interesting how those spikes are sticking up through the ice.”

I find that birders are the worst. A guy with a pair of binoculars will see my long lens and ask: “Did you see that fine example of a double-breasted hairy hoober goober?” And I’ll shrug and say: “I’m just here to shoot pretty birds.” I understand why it’s important for birders to bring Norman Clature into the field with them, but not all of us care for his company. Sometimes the visual effect of a photograph doesn’t depend on whether you can name the thing represented in the photograph. There it is! Look at it!

Categories
Nature

Porn sprouts like mushrooms on Twitter

Mushrooms on Log

In my previous post, I mentioned that pornography has sprouted like mushrooms on Twitter. At the same time, Twitter has announced that it will remove photographs if the subject hasn’t consented. The multi-billion dollar corporation will make exceptions for any photograph that “adds value to the public discourse, is being shared in the public interest, or is relevant to the community”. I guess porn doesn’t get caught up in this discussion because it’s consensual. At least we’re supposed to think it’s consensual. Consensual in the same way that exploited workers have always consented to their wages and working conditions.

Ah, says Twitter, that woman giving a blow job isn’t exploited; she works for a fun guy.

Fungi.

See how I made that segue? Because, really, I wanted this post to be about mushrooms. In particular, I wanted to show off this beautiful bunch of mushrooms I found on a log when I was walking along a country road in Haliburton. An overcast sky softened the shadows and made the colours more saturated. Perfect conditions for shooting with a macro lens.

Just so we understand one another: the fungi gave their consent to appear in my photo.